Home » The Curious Case Of The Olympics MVP Voting Process

The Curious Case Of The Olympics MVP Voting Process

The 2024 Olympics MVP decision process, as described by ESPN's Brian Windhorst, has certainly raised some eyebrows.

by Len Werle
0 comment

The selection of MVPs is often a topic of great interest and sometimes controversy. The 2024 Olympics MVP decision process, as described by ESPN’s Brian Windhorst, has certainly raised some eyebrows.

Brian Windhorst, a well-respected sports journalist, recently shed light on the peculiarities of the MVP voting process for the Olympics. According to Windhorst, the voting was conducted by the media and “FIBA experts.” However, the timing and method of the voting were quite unconventional.

Windhorst revealed that the voting opened two days before the end of the tournament, specifically during the semifinals. This timing is unusual because it means that the MVP was decided before the most critical games of the tournament—the semifinals and the finals—were even played. Windhorst questioned the logic behind this timing, asking, “Why would you vote now?”

Adding to the oddity, Windhorst mentioned that there was a QR code allegedly placed on the wall for the media to scan and cast their votes. This method, while modern and tech-savvy, seemed somewhat informal and hastily arranged. It raises questions about the transparency and reliability of the voting process.

The voting was conducted by a combination of media members and “FIBA experts.” While the involvement of media is standard in many sports, the inclusion of FIBA experts adds a layer of subjectivity. The criteria and qualifications for these experts were not clearly defined, leading to further speculation about the fairness and integrity of the process.

The Olympics MVP voting process, as described by Brian Windhorst, highlights some significant concerns about timing, transparency, and methodology. Voting during the semifinals and using a QR code on the wall are unconventional practices that have left many, including Windhorst, questioning the rationale behind these decisions. As the sports world continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see if FIBA addresses these concerns and makes changes to ensure a more transparent and logical MVP selection process in the future.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

About Us

Court is in session. You in?

Feature Posts